PageSpeed Insights logo
PageSpeed Insights
PageSpeed Insights
This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic.
Report from Aug 6, 2026, 4:07:39 PM
Discover what your real users are experiencing
No data found.
The Chrome User Experience Report does not have sufficient real-world speed data for this page.
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā Passed
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
1.6 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 2.5 s)92%Needs Improvement (2.5 s - 4 s)5%Poor (> 4 s)3%75th Percentile - 1.6 sCore Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
N/A
Page LoadsGood (≤ 200 ms)--%Needs Improvement (200 ms - 500 ms)--%Poor (> 500 ms)--%75th Percentile - N/ACore Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page LoadsGood (≤ 0.1)97%Needs Improvement (0.1 - 0.25)1%Poor (> 0.25)2%75th Percentile - 0Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1.3 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 1.8 s)90%Needs Improvement (1.8 s - 3 s)7%Poor (> 3 s)3%75th Percentile - 1.3 sĀ 
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
1.1 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 0.8 s)62%Needs Improvement (0.8 s - 1.8 s)34%Poor (> 1.8 s)4%75th Percentile - 1.1 sExperimental
Latest 28-day period
(history)
Various mobile devicesMany samples (Chrome UX Report)Full visit durationsVarious network connectionsAll Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues
Discover what your real users are experiencing
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā Failed
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
1.3 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 2.5 s)92%Needs Improvement (2.5 s - 4 s)3%Poor (> 4 s)5%75th Percentile - 1.3 sCore Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
245 ms
Page LoadsGood (≤ 200 ms)69%Needs Improvement (200 ms - 500 ms)17%Poor (> 500 ms)14%75th Percentile - 245 msCore Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0.08
Page LoadsGood (≤ 0.1)82%Needs Improvement (0.1 - 0.25)12%Poor (> 0.25)6%75th Percentile - 0.08Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
0.9 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 1.8 s)90%Needs Improvement (1.8 s - 3 s)6%Poor (> 3 s)4%75th Percentile - 0.9 sĀ 
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
0.7 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 0.8 s)80%Needs Improvement (0.8 s - 1.8 s)13%Poor (> 1.8 s)8%75th Percentile - 0.7 sExperimental
Latest 28-day period
(history)
Various desktop devicesMany samples (Chrome UX Report)Full visit durationsVarious network connectionsAll Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā Passed
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
2.3 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 2.5 s)78%Needs Improvement (2.5 s - 4 s)12%Poor (> 4 s)9%75th Percentile - 2.3 sCore Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
131 ms
Page LoadsGood (≤ 200 ms)84%Needs Improvement (200 ms - 500 ms)9%Poor (> 500 ms)7%75th Percentile - 131 msCore Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0.07
Page LoadsGood (≤ 0.1)81%Needs Improvement (0.1 - 0.25)12%Poor (> 0.25)7%75th Percentile - 0.07Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
2 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 1.8 s)71%Needs Improvement (1.8 s - 3 s)16%Poor (> 3 s)13%75th Percentile - 2 sĀ 
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
1.2 s
Page LoadsGood (≤ 0.8 s)56%Needs Improvement (0.8 s - 1.8 s)29%Poor (> 1.8 s)14%75th Percentile - 1.2 sExperimental
Latest 28-day period
(history)
Various desktop devicesMany samples (Chrome UX Report)Full visit durationsVarious network connectionsAll Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues
Oops! Something went wrong.
RPC::DEADLINE_EXCEEDED: context deadline exceeded