PageSpeed Insights logo
PageSpeed Insights
PageSpeed Insights
This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic.
Report from Oct 22, 2026, 3:21:24ā€ÆPM
Discover what your real users are experiencing
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā Passed
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
0.9 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 2.5 s)95%Needs Improvement (2.5 s - 4 s)1%Poor (> 4 s)4%75th Percentile - 0.9 sCore Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
N/A
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 200 ms)--%Needs Improvement (200 ms - 500 ms)--%Poor (> 500 ms)--%75th Percentile - N/ACore Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 0.1)99%Needs Improvement (0.1 - 0.25)0%Poor (> 0.25)1%75th Percentile - 0Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
0.9 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 1.8 s)93%Needs Improvement (1.8 s - 3 s)4%Poor (> 3 s)3%75th Percentile - 0.9 sĀ 
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
N/A
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 0.8 s)--%Needs Improvement (0.8 s - 1.8 s)--%Poor (> 1.8 s)--%75th Percentile - N/AExperimental
Latest 28-day period
(history)Various mobile devicesMany samples (Chrome UX Report)Full visit durationsVarious network connectionsAll Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā Passed
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
1.4 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 2.5 s)89%Needs Improvement (2.5 s - 4 s)5%Poor (> 4 s)7%75th Percentile - 1.4 sCore Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
139 ms
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 200 ms)82%Needs Improvement (200 ms - 500 ms)14%Poor (> 500 ms)3%75th Percentile - 139 msCore Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0.04
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 0.1)78%Needs Improvement (0.1 - 0.25)15%Poor (> 0.25)7%75th Percentile - 0.04Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1.2 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 1.8 s)88%Needs Improvement (1.8 s - 3 s)7%Poor (> 3 s)4%75th Percentile - 1.2 sĀ 
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
0.8 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 0.8 s)76%Needs Improvement (0.8 s - 1.8 s)17%Poor (> 1.8 s)6%75th Percentile - 0.8 sExperimental
Latest 28-day period
(history)Various mobile devicesMany samples (Chrome UX Report)Full visit durationsVarious network connectionsAll Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues
Discover what your real users are experiencing
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā Passed
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
0.9 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 2.5 s)98%Needs Improvement (2.5 s - 4 s)1%Poor (> 4 s)1%75th Percentile - 0.9 sCore Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
N/A
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 200 ms)--%Needs Improvement (200 ms - 500 ms)--%Poor (> 500 ms)--%75th Percentile - N/ACore Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 0.1)97%Needs Improvement (0.1 - 0.25)2%Poor (> 0.25)0%75th Percentile - 0Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
0.9 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 1.8 s)95%Needs Improvement (1.8 s - 3 s)4%Poor (> 3 s)1%75th Percentile - 0.9 sĀ 
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
N/A
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 0.8 s)--%Needs Improvement (0.8 s - 1.8 s)--%Poor (> 1.8 s)--%75th Percentile - N/AExperimental
Latest 28-day period
(history)Various desktop devicesMany samples (Chrome UX Report)Full visit durationsVarious network connectionsAll Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā Passed
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
1.1 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 2.5 s)95%Needs Improvement (2.5 s - 4 s)3%Poor (> 4 s)2%75th Percentile - 1.1 sCore Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
46 ms
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 200 ms)98%Needs Improvement (200 ms - 500 ms)1%Poor (> 500 ms)1%75th Percentile - 46 msCore Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0.06
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 0.1)81%Needs Improvement (0.1 - 0.25)13%Poor (> 0.25)6%75th Percentile - 0.06Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 1.8 s)94%Needs Improvement (1.8 s - 3 s)3%Poor (> 3 s)2%75th Percentile - 1 sĀ 
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
0.6 s
Page LoadsGood (ā‰¤ 0.8 s)85%Needs Improvement (0.8 s - 1.8 s)13%Poor (> 1.8 s)2%75th Percentile - 0.6 sExperimental
Latest 28-day period
(history)Various desktop devicesMany samples (Chrome UX Report)Full visit durationsVarious network connectionsAll Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues