This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic.
Learn More.
Ok, Got it.
Report from Dec 22, 2025, 4:13:26āÆAM
Enter a valid URL
Analyze
smartphone
Mobile
computer
Desktop
Discover what your real users are experiencing
This URL
Origin
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Failed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
8.9 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
0%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
0%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
99%
75th Percentile -
8.9 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
198 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
75%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
19%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
6%
75th Percentile -
198 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
93%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
7%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
1%
75th Percentile -
0
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
8.8 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
0%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
0%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
99%
75th Percentile -
8.8 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
6.2 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
0%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
0%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
100%
75th Percentile -
6.2 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
Nov 22, 2025 to Dec 19, 2025
(
history
)
Various mobile devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Failed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
7.5 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
2%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
19%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
80%
75th Percentile -
7.5 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
142 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
85%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
11%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
4%
75th Percentile -
142 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
92%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
5%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
3%
75th Percentile -
0
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
6.1 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
4%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
23%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
73%
75th Percentile -
6.1 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
4.5 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
0%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
11%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
88%
75th Percentile -
4.5 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
Nov 22, 2025 to Dec 19, 2025
(
history
)
Various mobile devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues
Discover what your real users are experiencing
This URL
Origin
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Failed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
10.9 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
4%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
1%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
96%
75th Percentile -
10.9 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
59 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
99%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
1%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
0%
75th Percentile -
59 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0.01
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
99%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
0%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
1%
75th Percentile -
0.01
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
7.5 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
3%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
1%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
96%
75th Percentile -
7.5 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
6.1 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
3%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
0%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
97%
75th Percentile -
6.1 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
Nov 22, 2025 to Dec 19, 2025
(
history
)
Various desktop devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Failed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
4 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
67%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
8%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
25%
75th Percentile -
4 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
37 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
100%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
0%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
0%
75th Percentile -
37 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0.01
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
85%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
14%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
1%
75th Percentile -
0.01
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
3.3 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
62%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
10%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
28%
75th Percentile -
3.3 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
2.9 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
53%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
9%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
38%
75th Percentile -
2.9 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
Nov 22, 2025 to Dec 19, 2025
(
history
)
Various desktop devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues