This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic.
Learn More.
Ok, Got it.
Report from Dec 12, 2025, 6:51:57āÆAM
Enter a valid URL
Analyze
smartphone
Mobile
computer
Desktop
Discover what your real users are experiencing
This URL
Origin
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Failed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
2.4 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
77%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
13%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
11%
75th Percentile -
2.4 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
477 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
51%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
25%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
24%
75th Percentile -
477 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
94%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
6%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
1%
75th Percentile -
0
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
2.2 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
67%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
18%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
15%
75th Percentile -
2.2 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
0.8 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
74%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
17%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
9%
75th Percentile -
0.8 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
Nov 12, 2025 to Dec 9, 2025
(
history
)
Various mobile devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Failed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
2.5 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
75%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
15%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
11%
75th Percentile -
2.5 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
440 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
53%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
26%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
21%
75th Percentile -
440 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
98%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
2%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
0%
75th Percentile -
0
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
2.4 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
60%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
22%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
17%
75th Percentile -
2.4 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
1 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
65%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
24%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
11%
75th Percentile -
1 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
Nov 12, 2025 to Dec 9, 2025
(
history
)
Various mobile devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues
Discover what your real users are experiencing
This URL
Origin
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Passed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
1.5 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
89%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
6%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
5%
75th Percentile -
1.5 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
125 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
82%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
10%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
8%
75th Percentile -
125 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
98%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
0%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
2%
75th Percentile -
0
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1.1 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
88%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
7%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
6%
75th Percentile -
1.1 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
0.5 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
85%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
9%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
6%
75th Percentile -
0.5 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
Nov 12, 2025 to Dec 9, 2025
(
history
)
Various desktop devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Passed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
1.5 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
88%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
7%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
5%
75th Percentile -
1.5 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
128 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
83%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
10%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
8%
75th Percentile -
128 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
98%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
0%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
2%
75th Percentile -
0
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1.3 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
85%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
9%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
6%
75th Percentile -
1.3 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
0.6 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
82%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
12%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
6%
75th Percentile -
0.6 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
Nov 12, 2025 to Dec 9, 2025
(
history
)
Various desktop devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues