This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic.
Learn More.
Ok, Got it.
Report from Jun 4, 2025, 8:57:04āÆAM
Enter a valid URL
Analyze
smartphone
Mobile
computer
Desktop
Discover what your real users are experiencing
This URL
Origin
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Failed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
2 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
83%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
10%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
7%
75th Percentile -
2 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
205 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
74%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
21%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
5%
75th Percentile -
205 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
98%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
1%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
0%
75th Percentile -
0
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1.8 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
73%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
16%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
11%
75th Percentile -
1.8 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
1 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
67%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
24%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
9%
75th Percentile -
1 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
May 5, 2025 to Jun 1, 2025
(
history
)
Various mobile devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Failed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
2.7 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
72%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
14%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
14%
75th Percentile -
2.7 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
240 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
68%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
23%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
8%
75th Percentile -
240 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0.01
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
81%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
2%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
16%
75th Percentile -
0.01
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1.9 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
73%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
15%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
12%
75th Percentile -
1.9 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
1 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
68%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
23%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
8%
75th Percentile -
1 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
May 5, 2025 to Jun 1, 2025
(
history
)
Various mobile devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues
Discover what your real users are experiencing
This URL
Origin
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Passed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
1.2 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
94%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
4%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
3%
75th Percentile -
1.2 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
59 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
93%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
5%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
2%
75th Percentile -
59 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
100%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
0%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
0%
75th Percentile -
0
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1.1 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
91%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
6%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
3%
75th Percentile -
1.1 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
0.7 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
82%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
15%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
3%
75th Percentile -
0.7 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
May 5, 2025 to Jun 1, 2025
(
history
)
Various desktop devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:Ā
Passed
Computed from the Core Web Vitals metrics over the latest 28-day collection period.
Learn more
Expand view
Collapse view
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
1.8 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
2.5 s
)
85%
Needs Improvement
(
2.5 s
-
4 s
)
9%
Poor
(>
4 s
)
6%
75th Percentile -
1.8 s
Core Web Vital
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
80 ms
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
200 ms
)
87%
Needs Improvement
(
200 ms
-
500 ms
)
8%
Poor
(>
500 ms
)
5%
75th Percentile -
80 ms
Core Web Vital
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
0.01
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.1
)
90%
Needs Improvement
(
0.1
-
0.25
)
1%
Poor
(>
0.25
)
9%
75th Percentile -
0.01
Core Web Vital
Other Notable Metrics
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
1.2 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
1.8 s
)
89%
Needs Improvement
(
1.8 s
-
3 s
)
7%
Poor
(>
3 s
)
4%
75th Percentile -
1.2 s
Ā
Time to First Byte (TTFB)
0.7 s
Page Loads
Good
(ā¤
0.8 s
)
80%
Needs Improvement
(
0.8 s
-
1.8 s
)
16%
Poor
(>
1.8 s
)
4%
75th Percentile -
0.7 s
Experimental
Latest 28-day period
Collection period is:
May 5, 2025 to Jun 1, 2025
(
history
)
Various desktop devices
Many samples (
Chrome UX Report
)
Full visit durations
Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Diagnose performance issues